BLUF
The debate over nuclear-armed submarine-launched cruise missiles highlights a clash between capability and practicality. With strategy focused on conventional deterrence and strategic modernisation, investing in new nuclear cruise missiles would divert resources from higher priorities.Learning Outcomes:
- Analyse how shifting U.S. nuclear strategy from Cold War escalation threats to conventional deterrence influences force development and capability prioritisation.
- Evaluate the opportunity costs of nuclear-armed cruise missiles for submarine operations and defence industry capacity, with implications for allied industrial bases.
- Assess the balance between strategic, theatre nuclear, and conventional deterrence, and consider its relevance for ADF nuclear policy and alliance reliance on U.S. extended deterrence.
