Sea mines: the asymmetrical weapon Australia must have.

Summary

ASPI argue that the acquisition of sea mines has a huge benefit-cost ratio for Australia and also provides a degree of self-sufficiency.

Sea mines have been the ugly duckling of maritime warfare. This article makes the following points:

• Mines can be deployed by submarine, surface or air.

• Cheap (as low as a few thousand dollars each).

• Different types, including influence mines as well as more advanced encapsulated torpedo mines, can be regarded as a form of asymmetrical warfare.

• Offshore patrol vessels and crafts of opportunity utilised.

• Modified autonomous underwater vehicles could deploy smart mobile mines that navigate autonomously into adversary controlled water.

• Minefields are a huge deterrent and suit a large maritime nation like Australia.

• They can be used offensively and defensively.

• Able to be turned on and off remotely, allowing the passage of friendly shipping.

• Can have a psychological impact on an adversary.

• Provides some strategic self-reliance.

The author notes:

• SEA 2000 aims to acquire a range of modern sea mines.

• Needs a cultural change within the RAN and the ADF.

• Mine acquisition will require political support.

• Australian industry participation is crucial in ensuring Australian independence in manufacture and deployment.

References

​​​​​​